TAMMY ABRAHAM REPORTEDLY AGREES £4M-A-YEAR TERMS TO REJOIN ASTON VILLA
Aston Villa are close to re-signing Tammy Abraham from Besiktas for £18m. Discover the personal terms and Unai Emery’s plan.
Aston Villa’s top brass just flew out to Turkey to try and bring Tammy Abraham back to Villa Park.
It’s been almost eight years since Abraham first joined Villa on loan from Chelsea and helped fire them back into the Premier League. Now, he’s at Besiktas, but word out of Turkey says Villa want him back, and they’re on the ground to make it happen.
With Donyell Malen gone, Unai Emery is after a new striker to challenge Ollie Watkins. Emery even admitted recently that Villa aren’t really in the top five mix, but he’s pushing hard to strengthen up front. Turkish media say Abraham could be heading back to Birmingham for a cut-price fee.
Besiktas loaned Abraham from Roma, and apparently, there’s a clause that lets them buy him outright for just over £11 million, which they’ve triggered. But according to Hurriyet, Villa sent officials to Turkey to try and get Abraham, watching him play against Kayserispor while they were there.
Meanwhile, Sabah reportsthat Besiktas want just under £18 million to let him go. Honestly, that’s not bad for an experienced 28-year-old striker. There’s also talk that Abraham’s already agreed to personal terms—a four-and-a-half-year deal worth £4 million a season after tax.
Besiktas seem to be hunting for a replacement, too. Napoli’s Romelu Lukaku is apparently on their list. As for Villa fans, the idea of Abraham coming back brings back great memories.
Back in 2018/19, he smashed in 26 goals in 46 games, pushing Villa to promotion after they beat Derby in the play-off final. Then Chelsea called him back when Frank Lampard took charge.
Since then, Abraham has played for Roma and AC Milan before landing at Besiktas. Villa signing him would be a big boost for Emery, who hasn’t hidden the fact that he wants another striker.
He explained it pretty clearly last week: “I arrived here three-and-a-half years ago, and we had Watkins and Ings. Ings left because he had good offers elsewhere. Back then, it was just like now.
“He was doing well, competing with Watkins, but decided to go. We brought in Jhon Duran, and over two years, he grew into the role, competing and getting numbers for us.
“Last year, same situation—he left. We got Rashford and Malen on loan as wingers or strikers, and after a year of good performances, Malen’s gone too.
“We need what we’ve had the last three years: someone to compete with Watkins. The priority is a central striker, someone who can play up top or even partner Watkins.
“Now Malen’s gone, and we need another player to step up and help out.”
THE 9-POINT GAP: UNEARTHING HOW A ASTON VILLA VICTORY COULD PERMANENTLY DERAIL CHELSEA’S TOP-FOUR HOPES
Champions League race: Read why Aston Villa vs Chelsea is a "must-win," the latest on Pedro Neto’s ban, and Emery’s injury news.
Unai Emery’s team wants to put some real distance between themselves and Chelsea in the Champions League race. Villa are hoping for a big win at home, especially since Chelsea haven’t exactly looked sharp lately; they’re trying to snap a three-game winless streak.
Villa sit fourth in the Premier League, level on points with Manchester United but just behind on goal difference. Their last match didn’t go the way they wanted. They lost 2-0 at Molineux, with Joao Gomes and Rodrigo Gomes both finding the net. They haven’t won there since December 2020, so that defeat stung – a wasted chance to get ahead of the other teams chasing a top-four spot.
Right now, Villa have only picked up one win from their last five league games. When Emery was asked if this match is a 'must-win', he kept it real: 'Our objective is to be in Europe, and we are in. Even if not in good form, we are in. And, of course, we are every day trying to recover our good form and our confidence, and tomorrow, Chelsea is our opponent, and of course, it’s a tough match.”
Villa have missed their captain, John McGinn, plus midfielders Youri Tielemans and Boubacar Kamara. Still, they’ll want to make it three straight league wins over Chelsea. If they do, they’d open up a nine-point gap and make a real statement about sticking in the top four.
Chelsea, in sixth place, also lost their last match. Arsenal beat them, and most of the damage came from set pieces plus an own goal by Piero Hincapié. Chelsea couldn’t defend corners, and discipline is still a big issue. For the ninth time this season, they finished a game with fewer than 11 players. Pedro Neto got two yellows in just three minutes.
That’s two red cards in as many games. It’s hurting their chances and points to a real problem keeping cool when it matters. Liam Rosenior didn’t sugarcoat it before this match: “I need to see an improvement in the behaviour now; it’s not just Pedro [Neto]. We’ve had bookings for needless dissent and fouls. It needs to improve. My job is to create a culture of accountability where if you make a mistake, it’s ok, but you have to hold your hand up and not do it again.”
Wesley Fofana is back from suspension, but Pedro Neto is now out. Jamie Gittens is sidelined with a hamstring problem, Estêvão’s got a thigh injury, and Marc Cucurella probably won’t be ready in time to play at Villa Park.
Villa aren’t at full strength either. They’re still without McGinn and Tielemans, and Kamara probably won’t play again this season. Andrés García has a thigh strain, and Harvey Elliot just hasn’t been able to make an impact since joining due to injuries or whatever else; it just hasn’t clicked.
THE WEBB FILES: UNEARTHING THE SECRET EVIDENCE TOTTENHAM SENT TO PGMOL CHIEF HOWARD WEBB
Tottenham have reached breaking point: Read the full report on their formal PGMOL complaint and Igor Tudor’s "obvious foul" claims.
Tottenham have reached their breaking point with Premier League refereeing. The club’s patience finally ran out, and they fired off a formal complaint to the Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL), calling out what they see as a string of inconsistent decisions. Right now, under interim boss Igor Tudor, the club’s already got enough on its plate, but they decided to go straight to PGMOL chief Howard Webb to spell out just how frustrated they are. Their main gripe? The way referees handle contact in the penalty area is especially crucial when it comes to deciding whether goals should count or not in crucial moments. For Tottenham, the standards just keep shifting.
What really pushed the board over the edge was how refs have handled almost identical situations in back-to-back games. During that bruising 4-1 loss to Arsenal on February 22, Randal Kolo Muani thought he’d scored a key equaliser, only to see it ruled out. The officials said he pushed Gabriel Magalhaes before scoring. Referee Peter Bankes even doubled down on TV, saying, “Once you see two hands in live play, it looks like a push, a clear push. I was more than happy that the two hands on the back had enough impact and were an offence.”
But just days later, things went the other way. Tottenham lost 2-1 at Fulham, and this time Harry Wilson’s opener stood, even though Raul Jimenez seemed to shove Radu Dragusin as they both went for a header. The officials brushed it off, saying the contact wasn’t enough for a foul. For Spurs, it was déjà vu, except, somehow, the rules had changed overnight. That kind of inconsistency has left everyone at the club shaking their heads, desperate for a real explanation.
Tudor didn’t bother hiding his anger after the Fulham match. He told reporters, “Of course, it’s a foul. Nine out of ten people will say it’s a foul because it’s so obvious, you know. Sometimes they don’t understand that it’s enough even with small contact; if it gives you an advantage to score, you need to cancel this. It’s not a normal duel when someone’s soft, no, when he pushes with the hands and doesn’t watch the ball, no. Sometimes it’s just easy to get an advantage.”
Tudor hasn’t won a game since taking over for Thomas Frank. Spurs are now five matches without a win, and their last league victory feels like ancient history back in December.
Tottenham’s letter to Webb isn’t just a list of their own hard-luck stories. They’ve pulled in examples from other matches across the league, trying to show this isn’t just a Spurs problem. One example: Nick Woltemade’s goal for Newcastle against Arsenal in September, where what looked like a push on Gabriel went unpunished, and the goal stood. Spurs want to show that refereeing standards are all over the place, and it’s messing with the fairness of results.
Since Howard Webb became PGMOL’s chief in 2022, he’s tried to open up communication and make the process more transparent. He’s gone on TV; he’s explained VAR decisions; he’s urged clubs to talk things out. But the flood of complaints this season suggests patience is wearing thin, and Tottenham clearly think public explanations aren’t fixing the real problem: the rules just aren’t being applied the same way each week.
And timing matters here. Tottenham are in trouble, sitting 16th in the Premier League, just four points above the drop zone. The fear of relegation is real unless something changes fast.
Nobody really knows if this formal protest will change how matches are officiated or if it’ll just end with a quiet apology behind closed doors, something that’s become pretty common these days. For now, Tudor and his players have to dig deep and hope their stand on refereeing finally gets them some luck, or at least some answers, before the season slips away for good.