StadiumPosts Logo
Stay upto date with notifications from Stadiumposts
Notifications can be managed in browser preferences

SHOCK: ALAN SHEARER OFFICIALLY SLAMS VAR FOR "RIDICULOUS" NEWCASTLE PENALTY SNUB VS CHELSEA

Alan Shearer and Eddie Howe blast VAR for denying Anthony Gordon a "stonewall" penalty in Newcastle's 2-2 Chelsea draw.

SHOCK: Alan Shearer officially slams VAR for "ridiculous" Newcastle penalty snub vs Chelsea
The secret VAR audio that has Eddie Howe and Shearer fuming

Alan Shearer wasn't happy that Newcastle didn't get a penalty in their 2-2 draw against Chelsea over the weekend.

The game at St. James' Park on Saturday was full of action. Nick Woltemade scored twice for Newcastle early on, putting them in a good spot.

Chelsea, with Enzo Maresca as their boss, fought back. Reece James scored a free kick soon after halftime, and then Joao Pedro tied the game up.

After that, neither side could get ahead, so they each ended up with a point. Still, Newcastle felt they should've had a penalty when Trevoh Chalobah seemed to take down Anthony Gordon in the box.

Replays showed Chalobah didn't touch the ball when Gordon went down after a shoulder-to-shoulder challenge. The ref, Andy Madley, didn't think it was a penalty, and VAR agreed, according to Chronicle Live.

But Newcastle legend Shearer saw it differently. On The Rest Is Football, he said the penalty decision was absolutely ridiculous, honestly.

Gary Lineker chimed in: It was a penalty; he just took him straight out. Shearer responded, Yeah, the Premier League even tweeted about it, saying he was shielding the ball. What a load of rubbish! It was as clear a foul as you could see. I can't believe those three pros, the ref, and the two VAR guys looked at that and thought it was alright.

Shearer wasn't the only one who thought so. Ally McCoist, who was commentating on the game, said he thought it was a stonewall penalty and couldn't believe it wasn't given.

Joe Cole added that Chalobah was too aggressive.

After the game, Eddie Howe said he also thought it was a stonewall penalty and was disappointed they didn't get it.

The Premier League Match Centre later explained why the penalty wasn't awarded, saying on X that VAR checked the play and decided Chalobah's contact on Gordon was side-to-side while he was shielding the ball.

VAR REVIEW: CHELSEA 2-2 BOURNEMOUTH, ESTêVãO PENALTY DRAMA EXPLAINED! WAS IT A FOUL OR A DIVE

Explaining the VAR: How an 11th-minute penalty check at Stamford Bridge saved a point for Chelsea against a resilient Bournemouth.

top-news
Antoine Semenyo’s clumsy challenge handed Chelsea a vital lifeline

Every week, the Video Assistant Referee stirs up drama in the Premier League. Let's break down how these calls are made and if they're actually right.

This season, we're digging into the big moments to explain the VAR process and the rules of the game.

What went down: Chelsea's Estêvão was moving into the Bournemouth box, with Antoine Semenyo on his tail. Estêvão went down after some contact with Semenyo. The ref, Barrott, waved off Chelsea's penalty shouts, saying there wasn't a foul. He thought both players made contact naturally as they were running, and Estêvão basically tripped himself.

VAR said, "After looking at it, VAR Pawson suggested Barrott take another look at the monitor for a possible penalty because Semenyo might have tripped Estêvão."

VAR's take: Pawson had to figure out if the contact was just part of the play, like the ref thought, or if Semenyo fouled Estêvão. It was clear Estêvão tripped, but the question was how the contact started.

At first glance, it would be hard for Pawson to disagree with the ref because the main TV angle wasn't clear. But after checking out the sideline and behind views, Pawson saw that Semenyo stepped into Estêvão's path, making enough contact with his leg to cause him to trip.

Pawson told Barrott to check the monitor for a possible penalty. Barrott watched the replays, agreed, and gave Chelsea the penalty.

The call: It was a reasonable VAR call based on today's standards. But it's a borderline case.

Barrott seemed unsure of the monitor and needed some convincing from different angles.

A lot of the time, this kind of contact is just from players running normally, and someone goes down. To give a penalty, there really needs to be a clear foul by the defender. You could say that happened here, but it's a pretty low standard for VAR to get involved.

Chelsea 2-2 AFC Bournemouth

Referee: Sam Barrott

VAR: Craig Pawson

What: VAR check for a foul in the box

When: 11th minute

BREAKING: UNAI EMERY REVEALS THE REAL REASON BEHIND HIS COLD ARTETA HANDSHAKE SNUB NOW

Unai Emery explains why he skipped the post-match handshake as Arsenal’s 4-1 win ends Aston Villa’s 11-game streak at the Emirates.

top-news
Emery snubs Arteta's handshake

Unai Emery said he didn't shake Mikel Arteta's hand right after Aston Villa lost at the Emirates Stadium since the Arsenal manager kept him waiting.

This loss stopped Villa's winning streak at 11 games, their first in almost two months.

Villa held their own in the first half, but Arsenal scored early in the second when Gabriel got to the ball before Emi Martinez on a corner.

Martin Zubimendi quickly made it 2-0, and Leandro Trossard scored a third goal a little after an hour had passed.

Soon after entering the pitch, Gabriel Jesus scored, making it 4-0. Ollie Watkins was able to respond by tapping in a goal late in the game after Donyell Malen's nice play.

After the game, Emery waited to shake Arteta's hand, but he went to the locker room since Arteta was still celebrating with his team.

It’s easy to see. I like to do things fast,” Emery said when asked about why he didn’t shake Arteta’s hand.

“I shake hands, then I go to the dressing room with my players and coaches. I was waiting.

“Arteta was busy with his coaches, so I went inside. It’s not a big deal for me.”

About the match, Emery commented, “We played great in the first half, and things were going our way. We had corners and defended well. We didn’t let them get a corner in the first half.

“We felt good, but we let in the first goal in the second half. Onana getting hurt didn’t help since he’s important for set pieces and in the midfield.

“We didn’t quit, and we kept playing hard. We scored one goal and almost scored more. Arsenal is the best team in the league and should win the title.

“I’m not sure which day it is since we’ve played Arsenal twice already, and we still have to play Nottingham. But I’m happy with our goals and how we're trying to attain them.

Premier League Standings

WhatsApp Read More News