ANALYTICAL CASE: LUCAS PAQUETA'S POOR FORM AGAINST VILLA PROVES TRANSFER NECESSITY
Lucas Paqueta's inconsistent play and mental distress make his sale essential for West Ham. Selling him in January could fund Nuno Espirito Santo's necessary squad overhaul.
West Ham and Nuno Espirito Santo could gain by letting Lucas Paqueta go in January.
Ahead of the January transfer window, there's expected to be interest in Paqueta. He's almost left a few times already.
Paqueta has said he’s missed chances to leave West Ham before. His poor play shows he regrets staying.
West Ham lost to Aston Villa, but the loss could have been avoided if the Brazilian had played better.
Stats from the game show how much his poor performance hurt West Ham's chances of winning.
Lucas Paqueta misplaced more passes than anyone else against Aston Villa. He has spoken about his mental issues at West Ham, especially with the betting allegations.
His recent red card against Liverpool added to the problem, and his latest game against Villa was not good.
West Ham was in the lead twice against Villa, but Villa had an advantage because of Paqueta’s bad play in midfield and attack.
He didn't help West Ham much on offence or defence, and Nuno is probably confused by the interest in him.
It’s best for everyone if he leaves, and not just because of his performance.
Selling Paqueta would give West Ham money to reinvest. The team needs to stay in the Premier League, and Nuno will need help in January.
Some might think Paqueta's leaving is bad. But it might be one of the better things that could happen.
He has skill sometimes, but he’s too risky to depend on when trying to avoid being relegated.
West Ham could get a lot of money for Paqueta, which they could use to fund Nuno’s team changes.
David Sullivan should think about any offer for the 28-year-old, since his value will likely go down after this season.
VAR REVIEW: CHELSEA 2-2 BOURNEMOUTH, ESTêVãO PENALTY DRAMA EXPLAINED! WAS IT A FOUL OR A DIVE
Explaining the VAR: How an 11th-minute penalty check at Stamford Bridge saved a point for Chelsea against a resilient Bournemouth.
Every week, the Video Assistant Referee stirs up drama in the Premier League. Let's break down how these calls are made and if they're actually right.
This season, we're digging into the big moments to explain the VAR process and the rules of the game.
What went down: Chelsea's Estêvão was moving into the Bournemouth box, with Antoine Semenyo on his tail. Estêvão went down after some contact with Semenyo. The ref, Barrott, waved off Chelsea's penalty shouts, saying there wasn't a foul. He thought both players made contact naturally as they were running, and Estêvão basically tripped himself.
VAR said, "After looking at it, VAR Pawson suggested Barrott take another look at the monitor for a possible penalty because Semenyo might have tripped Estêvão."
VAR's take: Pawson had to figure out if the contact was just part of the play, like the ref thought, or if Semenyo fouled Estêvão. It was clear Estêvão tripped, but the question was how the contact started.
At first glance, it would be hard for Pawson to disagree with the ref because the main TV angle wasn't clear. But after checking out the sideline and behind views, Pawson saw that Semenyo stepped into Estêvão's path, making enough contact with his leg to cause him to trip.
Pawson told Barrott to check the monitor for a possible penalty. Barrott watched the replays, agreed, and gave Chelsea the penalty.
The call: It was a reasonable VAR call based on today's standards. But it's a borderline case.
Barrott seemed unsure of the monitor and needed some convincing from different angles.
A lot of the time, this kind of contact is just from players running normally, and someone goes down. To give a penalty, there really needs to be a clear foul by the defender. You could say that happened here, but it's a pretty low standard for VAR to get involved.
Chelsea 2-2 AFC Bournemouth
Referee: Sam Barrott
VAR: Craig Pawson
What: VAR check for a foul in the box
When: 11th minute
BREAKING: UNAI EMERY REVEALS THE REAL REASON BEHIND HIS COLD ARTETA HANDSHAKE SNUB NOW
Unai Emery explains why he skipped the post-match handshake as Arsenal’s 4-1 win ends Aston Villa’s 11-game streak at the Emirates.
Unai Emery said he didn't shake Mikel Arteta's hand right after Aston Villa lost at the Emirates Stadium since the Arsenal manager kept him waiting.
This loss stopped Villa's winning streak at 11 games, their first in almost two months.
Villa held their own in the first half, but Arsenal scored early in the second when Gabriel got to the ball before Emi Martinez on a corner.
Martin Zubimendi quickly made it 2-0, and Leandro Trossard scored a third goal a little after an hour had passed.
Soon after entering the pitch, Gabriel Jesus scored, making it 4-0. Ollie Watkins was able to respond by tapping in a goal late in the game after Donyell Malen's nice play.
After the game, Emery waited to shake Arteta's hand, but he went to the locker room since Arteta was still celebrating with his team.
It’s easy to see. I like to do things fast,” Emery said when asked about why he didn’t shake Arteta’s hand.
“I shake hands, then I go to the dressing room with my players and coaches. I was waiting.
“Arteta was busy with his coaches, so I went inside. It’s not a big deal for me.”
About the match, Emery commented, “We played great in the first half, and things were going our way. We had corners and defended well. We didn’t let them get a corner in the first half.
“We felt good, but we let in the first goal in the second half. Onana getting hurt didn’t help since he’s important for set pieces and in the midfield.
“We didn’t quit, and we kept playing hard. We scored one goal and almost scored more. Arsenal is the best team in the league and should win the title.
“I’m not sure which day it is since we’ve played Arsenal twice already, and we still have to play Nottingham. But I’m happy with our goals and how we're trying to attain them.