StadiumPosts Logo
Stay upto date with notifications from Stadiumposts
Notifications can be managed in browser preferences

SEAN DYCHE: STOP MAKING REFEREES ANNOUNCE DECISIONS, LET THEM OFFICIATE

Sean Dyche questions the lengthy 5:33 VAR deliberation in Forest's 1-0 victory, arguing the speed of decisions must improve to protect managers.

Sean Dyche: Stop Making Referees Announce Decisions, Let Them Officiate
Dyche Slams VAR: Five Minutes 33 Seconds Is "Miles Too Long"

After Nottingham Forest's 1-0 win at Wolves, manager Sean Dyche expressed his confusion over the lengthy VAR reviews.

Igor Jesus had a first-half goal disallowed for offside after a VAR check that took five minutes and 33 seconds.

Even though Dan Ndoye was clearly offside in front of Wolves' goalie, Sam Johnstone, VAR official Rob Jones needed a very long time to tell referee Tim Robinson to look at the monitor. Then, the referee also took a long time to decide, even though it looked obvious on the replay.

Jesus did score the winning goal in the second half, but Dyche was more concerned about the time it took to make the offside call.

Dyche said managers used to worry about bad calls that could cost them their jobs. Now, VAR should make things more fair, but there will still be hard decisions, even with VAR.

He went on to say that five minutes is too long. With so many people in the VAR room, they should be able to make those calls much faster.

Dyche understands the fans' frustration, but he also knows that his job can rely on these calls. It’s a tough situation. When reviews take that long, it goes back to what he said when VAR was first introduced: they need to speed it up.

Dyche also doesn’t get why referees have to announce the decision to the crowd after a VAR check.

"It takes forever already, so just make the call and move on," he said. He thinks referees have a tough job and do well overall. There’s no reason to add more pressure by making them speak in front of a huge crowd. It’s not natural for everyone, so just let them do their job without making it harder.

One goal was always going to be enough against Wolves. They haven't scored in five league games and look like they're headed for relegation.

They haven’t won in 14 games, and with games against Manchester United and Arsenal coming up, they could be in trouble.

Wolves' manager, Rob Edwards, seems to have accepted their fate. He asked his players if they were scared at halftime, and they said no. He told them that they don't want to go down without a fight. That will be the message moving forward.

VAR REVIEW: CHELSEA 2-2 BOURNEMOUTH, ESTêVãO PENALTY DRAMA EXPLAINED! WAS IT A FOUL OR A DIVE

Explaining the VAR: How an 11th-minute penalty check at Stamford Bridge saved a point for Chelsea against a resilient Bournemouth.

top-news
Antoine Semenyo’s clumsy challenge handed Chelsea a vital lifeline

Every week, the Video Assistant Referee stirs up drama in the Premier League. Let's break down how these calls are made and if they're actually right.

This season, we're digging into the big moments to explain the VAR process and the rules of the game.

What went down: Chelsea's Estêvão was moving into the Bournemouth box, with Antoine Semenyo on his tail. Estêvão went down after some contact with Semenyo. The ref, Barrott, waved off Chelsea's penalty shouts, saying there wasn't a foul. He thought both players made contact naturally as they were running, and Estêvão basically tripped himself.

VAR said, "After looking at it, VAR Pawson suggested Barrott take another look at the monitor for a possible penalty because Semenyo might have tripped Estêvão."

VAR's take: Pawson had to figure out if the contact was just part of the play, like the ref thought, or if Semenyo fouled Estêvão. It was clear Estêvão tripped, but the question was how the contact started.

At first glance, it would be hard for Pawson to disagree with the ref because the main TV angle wasn't clear. But after checking out the sideline and behind views, Pawson saw that Semenyo stepped into Estêvão's path, making enough contact with his leg to cause him to trip.

Pawson told Barrott to check the monitor for a possible penalty. Barrott watched the replays, agreed, and gave Chelsea the penalty.

The call: It was a reasonable VAR call based on today's standards. But it's a borderline case.

Barrott seemed unsure of the monitor and needed some convincing from different angles.

A lot of the time, this kind of contact is just from players running normally, and someone goes down. To give a penalty, there really needs to be a clear foul by the defender. You could say that happened here, but it's a pretty low standard for VAR to get involved.

Chelsea 2-2 AFC Bournemouth

Referee: Sam Barrott

VAR: Craig Pawson

What: VAR check for a foul in the box

When: 11th minute

BREAKING: UNAI EMERY REVEALS THE REAL REASON BEHIND HIS COLD ARTETA HANDSHAKE SNUB NOW

Unai Emery explains why he skipped the post-match handshake as Arsenal’s 4-1 win ends Aston Villa’s 11-game streak at the Emirates.

top-news
Emery snubs Arteta's handshake

Unai Emery said he didn't shake Mikel Arteta's hand right after Aston Villa lost at the Emirates Stadium since the Arsenal manager kept him waiting.

This loss stopped Villa's winning streak at 11 games, their first in almost two months.

Villa held their own in the first half, but Arsenal scored early in the second when Gabriel got to the ball before Emi Martinez on a corner.

Martin Zubimendi quickly made it 2-0, and Leandro Trossard scored a third goal a little after an hour had passed.

Soon after entering the pitch, Gabriel Jesus scored, making it 4-0. Ollie Watkins was able to respond by tapping in a goal late in the game after Donyell Malen's nice play.

After the game, Emery waited to shake Arteta's hand, but he went to the locker room since Arteta was still celebrating with his team.

It’s easy to see. I like to do things fast,” Emery said when asked about why he didn’t shake Arteta’s hand.

“I shake hands, then I go to the dressing room with my players and coaches. I was waiting.

“Arteta was busy with his coaches, so I went inside. It’s not a big deal for me.”

About the match, Emery commented, “We played great in the first half, and things were going our way. We had corners and defended well. We didn’t let them get a corner in the first half.

“We felt good, but we let in the first goal in the second half. Onana getting hurt didn’t help since he’s important for set pieces and in the midfield.

“We didn’t quit, and we kept playing hard. We scored one goal and almost scored more. Arsenal is the best team in the league and should win the title.

“I’m not sure which day it is since we’ve played Arsenal twice already, and we still have to play Nottingham. But I’m happy with our goals and how we're trying to attain them.

Premier League Standings

WhatsApp Read More News