StadiumPosts Logo
Stay upto date with notifications from Stadiumposts
Notifications can be managed in browser preferences

PREMIER LEAGUE FACES LEGAL THREAT FROM PALMER AND MAINOO AGENCIES

Leading agencies CAA Base, CAA Stellar, and Wasserman are threatening to sue the Premier League over proposed new spending caps. The rules, including 'top to bottom anchoring', face a crucial vote and major opposition.

Premier League faces legal threat from Palmer and Mainoo agencies
Premier League hit with lawsuit threat - Action Image via Reuters

Three of the largest football agencies in England, CAA Base, CAA Stellar, and Wasserman, have vowed to sue the Premier League over proposed new spending regulations.

"Top to bottom anchoring" (TBA), one of the contentious new financial restrictions, would impose a salary limitation on all 20 teams in the English top flight, restricting the amount of money they could spend on players, including their salaries, agents' fees, and transfer fees.

The topic of substituting "squad cost ratios" (SCR) for profit and sustainability rules (PSR) will also be discussed. At the upcoming Premier League shareholders' meeting on Friday, a vote will be held to determine whether the plans are approved.

Leading law firm Clifford Chance has sent a letter formally opposing CAA Base, CAA Stellar, and Wasserman, whose combined client lists include Chelsea talisman Cole Palmer and Manchester United midfielder Kobbie Mainoo, ahead of the crucial vote, according to The Athletic.

Both TBA and SCR, which would prohibit clubs from spending more than 85% of their annual revenue, were denounced by the three agencies. Additionally, they charged that the Premier League had developed these new rules without first consulting them.

The most recent overt opposition to the suggested modifications is the threat of legal action by the three leading agencies.

The Professional Footballers' Association (PFA) president, Maheta Molango, pledged that the players' union will "take measures to contest the new rules if they are brought in."

"Clubs that see the modifications as a blatant trade restriction will likewise take action," the CEO continued. The anchoring measures have drawn criticism from competition experts since they lack precedent and will undoubtedly face legal challenges.

Several teams are believed to be voting against the expenditure changes, including Manchester United and City. A two-thirds majority of teams must support the idea in Friday's London vote for it to advance to the Premier League.

VAR REVIEW: CHELSEA 2-2 BOURNEMOUTH, ESTêVãO PENALTY DRAMA EXPLAINED! WAS IT A FOUL OR A DIVE

Explaining the VAR: How an 11th-minute penalty check at Stamford Bridge saved a point for Chelsea against a resilient Bournemouth.

top-news
Antoine Semenyo’s clumsy challenge handed Chelsea a vital lifeline

Every week, the Video Assistant Referee stirs up drama in the Premier League. Let's break down how these calls are made and if they're actually right.

This season, we're digging into the big moments to explain the VAR process and the rules of the game.

What went down: Chelsea's Estêvão was moving into the Bournemouth box, with Antoine Semenyo on his tail. Estêvão went down after some contact with Semenyo. The ref, Barrott, waved off Chelsea's penalty shouts, saying there wasn't a foul. He thought both players made contact naturally as they were running, and Estêvão basically tripped himself.

VAR said, "After looking at it, VAR Pawson suggested Barrott take another look at the monitor for a possible penalty because Semenyo might have tripped Estêvão."

VAR's take: Pawson had to figure out if the contact was just part of the play, like the ref thought, or if Semenyo fouled Estêvão. It was clear Estêvão tripped, but the question was how the contact started.

At first glance, it would be hard for Pawson to disagree with the ref because the main TV angle wasn't clear. But after checking out the sideline and behind views, Pawson saw that Semenyo stepped into Estêvão's path, making enough contact with his leg to cause him to trip.

Pawson told Barrott to check the monitor for a possible penalty. Barrott watched the replays, agreed, and gave Chelsea the penalty.

The call: It was a reasonable VAR call based on today's standards. But it's a borderline case.

Barrott seemed unsure of the monitor and needed some convincing from different angles.

A lot of the time, this kind of contact is just from players running normally, and someone goes down. To give a penalty, there really needs to be a clear foul by the defender. You could say that happened here, but it's a pretty low standard for VAR to get involved.

Chelsea 2-2 AFC Bournemouth

Referee: Sam Barrott

VAR: Craig Pawson

What: VAR check for a foul in the box

When: 11th minute

BREAKING: UNAI EMERY REVEALS THE REAL REASON BEHIND HIS COLD ARTETA HANDSHAKE SNUB NOW

Unai Emery explains why he skipped the post-match handshake as Arsenal’s 4-1 win ends Aston Villa’s 11-game streak at the Emirates.

top-news
Emery snubs Arteta's handshake

Unai Emery said he didn't shake Mikel Arteta's hand right after Aston Villa lost at the Emirates Stadium since the Arsenal manager kept him waiting.

This loss stopped Villa's winning streak at 11 games, their first in almost two months.

Villa held their own in the first half, but Arsenal scored early in the second when Gabriel got to the ball before Emi Martinez on a corner.

Martin Zubimendi quickly made it 2-0, and Leandro Trossard scored a third goal a little after an hour had passed.

Soon after entering the pitch, Gabriel Jesus scored, making it 4-0. Ollie Watkins was able to respond by tapping in a goal late in the game after Donyell Malen's nice play.

After the game, Emery waited to shake Arteta's hand, but he went to the locker room since Arteta was still celebrating with his team.

It’s easy to see. I like to do things fast,” Emery said when asked about why he didn’t shake Arteta’s hand.

“I shake hands, then I go to the dressing room with my players and coaches. I was waiting.

“Arteta was busy with his coaches, so I went inside. It’s not a big deal for me.”

About the match, Emery commented, “We played great in the first half, and things were going our way. We had corners and defended well. We didn’t let them get a corner in the first half.

“We felt good, but we let in the first goal in the second half. Onana getting hurt didn’t help since he’s important for set pieces and in the midfield.

“We didn’t quit, and we kept playing hard. We scored one goal and almost scored more. Arsenal is the best team in the league and should win the title.

“I’m not sure which day it is since we’ve played Arsenal twice already, and we still have to play Nottingham. But I’m happy with our goals and how we're trying to attain them.

Premier League Standings

WhatsApp Read More News