StadiumPosts Logo
Stay upto date with notifications from Stadiumposts
Notifications can be managed in browser preferences

DANIEL FARKE ISSUES HARSH DAN JAMES VERDICT POST-LEEDS SNUB

Leeds boss Daniel Farke defended dropping Dan James for the defeat at Nottingham Forest, calling it a "performance-related decision." James came off the bench and nearly scored a late equaliser.

Daniel Farke issues harsh Dan James verdict post-Leeds snub
Dan James - Photo by Visionhaus/Getty Images

Farke defended his choice to start Brenden Aaronson and Noah Okafor on the wings at the City Ground in an interview with BBC Radio Leeds following his team's loping loss on the road.

Farke claims that James has not taken "the league by storm" this season and that performance, not fitness, was the deciding factor in his choice.

"He could have started, of course," the Leeds manager stated.

It is a performance-related decision as well as a tactical one.  In any case, throughout the past four months, he has hardly been on the field. Due to an injury, he was out of the Championship for almost three months.  Due to his injury, he did not have the best preseason or the best run of games.

He was also out for a while when the Premier League season began.  He took the league by storm, but I did not witness that in the last games when he entered.

It is not that simple since we have other offensive players who are really excellent. I would have to leave out Noah Okafor, Brenden Aaronson, or Sean Longstaff, a leader, or a workhorse, just because he is currently fit. In any case, the competition always wins. But in terms of fitness, he has returned.

Daniel Farke's cameo with Dan James demonstrates why he ought to have begun


In a last-ditch effort to save a point, Farke substituted all of his attacking options, including Dan James, who eventually came on the field for the final fifteen minutes.

James came closest for Leeds with a curling attempt at goal that was tipped around the post for a corner, but he was unable to make a significant contribution.

With 22 minutes remaining, Forest took the lead, and the Welshman looked energetic in his brief appearance, raising the issue of why he was not brought in sooner.

By a considerable margin, James is Leeds' fastest player. In such an important game, it was counterproductive to leave him on the bench for seventy-five minutes after setting Leeds up for a counterattack.

VAR REVIEW: CHELSEA 2-2 BOURNEMOUTH, ESTêVãO PENALTY DRAMA EXPLAINED! WAS IT A FOUL OR A DIVE

Explaining the VAR: How an 11th-minute penalty check at Stamford Bridge saved a point for Chelsea against a resilient Bournemouth.

top-news
Antoine Semenyo’s clumsy challenge handed Chelsea a vital lifeline

Every week, the Video Assistant Referee stirs up drama in the Premier League. Let's break down how these calls are made and if they're actually right.

This season, we're digging into the big moments to explain the VAR process and the rules of the game.

What went down: Chelsea's Estêvão was moving into the Bournemouth box, with Antoine Semenyo on his tail. Estêvão went down after some contact with Semenyo. The ref, Barrott, waved off Chelsea's penalty shouts, saying there wasn't a foul. He thought both players made contact naturally as they were running, and Estêvão basically tripped himself.

VAR said, "After looking at it, VAR Pawson suggested Barrott take another look at the monitor for a possible penalty because Semenyo might have tripped Estêvão."

VAR's take: Pawson had to figure out if the contact was just part of the play, like the ref thought, or if Semenyo fouled Estêvão. It was clear Estêvão tripped, but the question was how the contact started.

At first glance, it would be hard for Pawson to disagree with the ref because the main TV angle wasn't clear. But after checking out the sideline and behind views, Pawson saw that Semenyo stepped into Estêvão's path, making enough contact with his leg to cause him to trip.

Pawson told Barrott to check the monitor for a possible penalty. Barrott watched the replays, agreed, and gave Chelsea the penalty.

The call: It was a reasonable VAR call based on today's standards. But it's a borderline case.

Barrott seemed unsure of the monitor and needed some convincing from different angles.

A lot of the time, this kind of contact is just from players running normally, and someone goes down. To give a penalty, there really needs to be a clear foul by the defender. You could say that happened here, but it's a pretty low standard for VAR to get involved.

Chelsea 2-2 AFC Bournemouth

Referee: Sam Barrott

VAR: Craig Pawson

What: VAR check for a foul in the box

When: 11th minute

BREAKING: UNAI EMERY REVEALS THE REAL REASON BEHIND HIS COLD ARTETA HANDSHAKE SNUB NOW

Unai Emery explains why he skipped the post-match handshake as Arsenal’s 4-1 win ends Aston Villa’s 11-game streak at the Emirates.

top-news
Emery snubs Arteta's handshake

Unai Emery said he didn't shake Mikel Arteta's hand right after Aston Villa lost at the Emirates Stadium since the Arsenal manager kept him waiting.

This loss stopped Villa's winning streak at 11 games, their first in almost two months.

Villa held their own in the first half, but Arsenal scored early in the second when Gabriel got to the ball before Emi Martinez on a corner.

Martin Zubimendi quickly made it 2-0, and Leandro Trossard scored a third goal a little after an hour had passed.

Soon after entering the pitch, Gabriel Jesus scored, making it 4-0. Ollie Watkins was able to respond by tapping in a goal late in the game after Donyell Malen's nice play.

After the game, Emery waited to shake Arteta's hand, but he went to the locker room since Arteta was still celebrating with his team.

It’s easy to see. I like to do things fast,” Emery said when asked about why he didn’t shake Arteta’s hand.

“I shake hands, then I go to the dressing room with my players and coaches. I was waiting.

“Arteta was busy with his coaches, so I went inside. It’s not a big deal for me.”

About the match, Emery commented, “We played great in the first half, and things were going our way. We had corners and defended well. We didn’t let them get a corner in the first half.

“We felt good, but we let in the first goal in the second half. Onana getting hurt didn’t help since he’s important for set pieces and in the midfield.

“We didn’t quit, and we kept playing hard. We scored one goal and almost scored more. Arsenal is the best team in the league and should win the title.

“I’m not sure which day it is since we’ve played Arsenal twice already, and we still have to play Nottingham. But I’m happy with our goals and how we're trying to attain them.

Premier League Standings

WhatsApp Read More News