INSIDE THE "KILLER INSTINCT" DEBATE: WHAT JIMMY CONNORS REALLY MEANT ABOUT ARYNA SABALENKA
Jimmy Connors criticizes Aryna Sabalenka for lacking "killer instinct" after she blew a 3-0 lead against Elena Rybakina in Melbourne.
Jimmy Connors didn’t hold back about Aryna Sabalenka’s performance in the Australian Open final—he thinks she just didn’t have that killer instinct when it mattered.
For about a set and a half, Sabalenka had a rough time trying to break Elena Rybakina’s serve. She finally did it in the tenth game of the second set, forced a third set, and quickly jumped out to a 3-0 lead. She even got within two points of going up 4-0. But after that, things completely unravelled. Sabalenka lost the next five games, suddenly trailing 3-5. She managed to hold serve one more time, but Rybakina kept her cool and closed it out, winning 6-4, 4-6, 6-4.
Connors, who’s racked up eight Grand Slam titles himself, didn’t mince words. He said Sabalenka should never have let it slip away.
“Sabalenka—she was up 3-0 in the third, right? I might get a little heat for this, but you need that killer instinct,” Connors said on his podcast. “When you’re in a final, and you’ve got someone on the ropes, you have to stay on top, keep the pressure on, cut down on mistakes, and make your opponent fight for every single point. Don’t hand anything over.”
He pointed out Sabalenka’s history of tough losses, saying, “She’s had some bad luck in finals, and maybe there were a few she should’ve won. But when you’re up 3-0 in the third set of a major, you have to finish the job. She’s way too good not to.”
This latest loss marks Sabalenka’s third Grand Slam final defeat in the past year—she fell short in last year’s Australian Open and French Open finals, though she did win the US Open. That puts her at 4-4 in Grand Slam finals.
On the flip side, Rybakina adds the Australian Open title to her resume. With Wimbledon already under her belt, she now owns two Grand Slam trophies.
IGA SWIATEK AND RADUCANU REJECT SABALENKA’S FIERCE FRENCH OPEN PLAYER BOYCOTT THREAT
Iga Swiatek and Emma Raducanu have rejected Aryna Sabalenka’s calls for a player boycott over Grand Slam prize money disputes.
Iga Swiatek, Coco Gauff, and Emma Raducanu had a lot to say after Aryna Sabalenka suggested that top tennis players might boycott Grand Slam tournaments because of the ongoing prize money dispute.
Sabalenka, Swiatek, and Gauff were among several stars who called out the low prize money at the 2026 French Open. After that, Sabalenka, currently world No. 1, came out swinging in her pre-tournament press conference for the Italian Open. “I think at some point we will boycott Grand Slams,” she said. “Honestly, it feels like that’s the only way we’ll fight for our rights. Let’s see how far it goes; maybe it’ll take a boycott. I really think it’ll get to that, especially because things feel unfair for us players lately. Nowadays, women can easily come together for this.”
Coco Gauff backed her up. Talking to reporters in Rome, she said, “Honestly, I kind of agree. Look at the WNBA; they managed to get a union, and that helped a lot.” Gauff, ranked No. 4 in the world, pointed out how unions in other sports have been key to big progress. “We need to get unionised somehow. Media pressure helps, but we need all of us to be on the same page. I know a few other players agree.”
Gauff also admitted she’s never really been part of serious boycott talks. “Maybe other players have discussions about it, but I haven’t talked to anyone on tour. If everyone worked together, I could see it happening. It’s not just about me; it’s about the future of our sport and the players who don’t get the same benefits as the top names. We’re making money off court, but look at the players ranked 50 to 200. Grand Slams rake in cash, but outside the top 50, players are living pay cheque to pay cheque. In other sports, that wouldn’t even be an issue.”
Iga Swiatek, who’s won six Grand Slams, thinks a boycott would be “a bit extreme". She said, “The most important thing is actually talking with the governing bodies. We need space to negotiate, and hopefully, before Roland Garros, we’ll get the chance to have these kinds of meetings. Boycotting feels extreme to me. Players are here to compete as individuals, so I have no idea how a united boycott would work. For now, I haven’t heard anything solid.”
Emma Raducanu, the 2021 US Open champ, isn’t interested in a boycott either. She told BBC Sport, “Grand Slams give you something money can’t. That’s what matters most to me. I wouldn’t join a boycott, but everyone has their own priorities.”
ARYNA SABALENKA WARNS "NO SHOW WITHOUT US" DURING FIERY ITALIAN OPEN PRESSER
Aryna Sabalenka and top tennis stars threaten a French Open boycott over a disappointing 15% tournament revenue prize pool split.
World No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka isn’t holding back; she’s openly considering a Grand Slam boycott if players keep feeling shortchanged on prize money.
She spoke out on Tuesday at the Italian Open, fresh off the heels of a letter sent by top ATP and WTA players who called the French Open’s prize pool disappointing. These players think their pay just doesn’t line up with tournament revenues, which keep going up.
“Look, without us, there’s no tournament, no show,” Sabalenka said. “At some point, I think we’ll have to boycott. It feels like that’s the only card left to play if we want to stand up for ourselves.”
She also thinks the women’s side of the game could unite like never before. “Right now, we girls could definitely come together for this; things are going on that just aren’t fair to the players. Sooner or later, I see it happening.”
Coco Gauff and Elena Rybakina, current French and Australian Open champs, threw their weight behind Sabalenka. Gauff said she “100%” sees a boycott happening if the players agree. She pointed out that this isn’t just about stars like herself. “It’s about the future, and the players grinding outside the top 50 or 100. When you look at how much money Slams make, it’s crazy that players ranked 200 are still living paycheck to paycheck, which isn’t even a conversation in most other major sports.”
For context, the French Open’s 2026 prize pool will be $72.3 million, up $6.5 million from 2025. But that's still only about 15% of expected tournament revenue, down from 15.5% last year. Players want a 22% cut by 2030, which is what they get at joint ATP and WTA 1000 events like Indian Wells or the Italian Open.
There’s another twist: prize money for players who lose in the first three rounds at Roland-Garros went up 11%, but for the champs, it only went up 9.8%. The French Tennis Federation said it wanted to help early-round losers more.
Compare that to American pro leagues: NFL, NBA, and MLB players get close to half of league revenue. Even WNBA players will get 20% after their new CBA, up from 9.3%.
In their letter, the players said they’re “getting a shrinking piece of the value they help create.” They also called out Grand Slam tournaments for being slow to modernise or give players a stronger voice.
Twenty players, including Sabalenka, Jannik Sinner, Carlos Alcaraz, and Gauff, signed onto that letter. They’ve already sent similar requests to all four Slams before asking for bigger revenue shares, a Grand Slam Player Council, and better benefits like pensions and health coverage.
World No. 3 Iga Świątek isn’t quite ready to back a boycott: she said at the Italian Open that it sounded “a bit extreme.” She’d rather see real talks between players and tennis authorities and some space to negotiate.
ATP No. 6 Ben Shelton hadn’t heard much about a potential strike, but he wants more player voice and actual seats at the decision-making table.
These latest demands echo moves from the Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA), which Djokovic co-founded. The PTPA filed an antitrust lawsuit against the tours and all four Slams, seeking more revenue and other benefits. That case settled with Tennis Australia in late 2025.
So far, no one from the Grand Slam tournaments has responded to any of this.