INSIDE THE SCRAP FOR MARC GUéHI AS LIVERPOOL’S SUMMER DEAL RESURFACES
From a booked medical to a bidding war, discover the latest on Marc Guéhi’s future as Palace prepares for January offers.
Liverpool isn’t the only one going after Marc Guehi. Clubs all over Europe—and plenty in the Premier League—are lining up for the Crystal Palace captain. It’s turning into a real scrap.
Losing out on Guehi would sting for Liverpool. They actually had a deal in place with Palace last summer—£35 million, everything set up, even a medical booked for deadline day. Then Palace pulled the plug. Manager Oliver Glasner didn’t want to lose his centre-back and made sure Guehi stayed put.
Now things have shifted. Glasner softened his stance, and he’s basically said Palace will sell if someone comes in with a big enough offer this month. Liverpool were happy to wait and try again in the summer, maybe even get Guehi on a free. But with Manchester City circling, they might not have that luxury anymore.
According to Sky Sports News, Guehi hasn’t decided if he wants to leave this month. Liverpool, City, Arsenal, Chelsea, Bayern Munich, Barcelona, and Real Madrid—they’re all still keen. Palace is bracing for another bid from Liverpool after last summer’s deal fell apart. And since Guehi’s contract is up in six months and he’s not planning to sign a new one, Palace could end up accepting less than the original £35 million.
Glasner talked about Guehi’s situation earlier this week. He said, “I think Marc will stay, but if he wants to go and someone offers huge money—especially with only five months left on his contract—then he’ll leave. That’s just how it works at a club like Palace. I’m sure the chairman will want a big fee, but who knows if Marc even wants out?”
Is Glasner worried about losing his captain in January? Not really. “No more than I was in the summer,” he said. “If the offer’s right and Marc wants to leave, he’ll go. That’s football, especially for a club that isn’t at the top of the food chain.”
He seemed a bit surprised by all the fuss. “Honestly, it’s the same situation as last summer. When I see Marc at training, when I talk to him, he’s totally committed. The fans shouldn’t panic. But in football, you never really know what’s next.”
DERBY OUTRAGE: PETER BANKES DOUBLES DOWN ON DISALLOWED KOLO MUANI GOAL DESPITE MASSIVE CRITICISM
Referee verdict: Discover why Peter Bankes disallowed Kolo Muani’s goal and Keith Hackett’s "stupid and soft" reaction.
Referee Peter Bankes stood by his call to disallow Randal Kolo Muani’s equaliser in the North London derby, calling it “a very, very clear offence.”
The moment sparked outrage. Gabriel, Arsenal’s defender, hit the deck after Muani’s challenge in the box. Former Premier League referees’ chief Keith Hackett didn’t hold back, calling the decision “stupid and soft".
Bankes didn’t hesitate. He blew for a foul, ruled out the goal, and VAR stayed out of it, even as Spurs fans fumed. That goal would’ve levelled it at 2-2.
Bankes explained on the Match Officials Mic’d Up show: “I was exactly where I needed to be for a cross from the right. I saw the Tottenham player put two hands into the back of the Arsenal player. That’s what grabbed my attention. When you see that live, it looks like a straightforward push – a clear foul.
“I held off on the whistle to let play run, then made the call after the ball went in. That way, VAR could step in if I’d missed something or if it looked off. But honestly, on the pitch, it looked obvious.
“I’m still comfortable with my decision. Sure, things can look different at different speeds; slow motion isn’t the same as seeing it live. But I got one look, and I was confident the two hands on the back had enough impact to be a foul.
“I know people will split on this, but I’m comfortable. That’s a free kick for me.”
The decision was a huge break for Arsenal, who ended up winning 4-1. As far as Spurs fans were concerned, Gabriel got away with one.
Ex-Premier League referee Dermot Gallagher backed Bankes up: “The on-field decision always stands. The ref saw enough for a push. VAR isn’t going to overturn that when the evidence is there.”
THE GIBBS-WHITE PROJECT: WHY MANCHESTER UNITED SEE THE FOREST STAR AS THEIR NEXT PLAYMAKER
United transfer hub. Get the report on wage bill cuts, the Forest playmaker, and City’s rival interest.
Manchester United still have a bit of a wait before the summer transfer window opens, but talk around Old Trafford is already heating up. People keep linking United with all kinds of new signings for when the season wraps up.
Michael Carrick has made quite the impression as United’s interim head coach so far. The club handed him the reins until the end of the season, and honestly, he’s done well with the opportunity.
Still, no one really knows who’ll be in charge next season. That uncertainty just adds fuel to the rumours about which players United will chase in the transfer market.
Right now, everything hinges on Champions League qualification. United sit fourth in the Premier League after a 1-0 win over Everton on Monday night. That spot could make all the difference for summer plans.
Morgan Gibbs-White's claim
Now, United have reportedly joined the hunt for Nottingham Forest’s Morgan Gibbs-White. The Daily Mail says United are keeping an eye on the Forest playmaker, maybe even lining up a summer move.
But there’s a snag: United want to bring down their wage bill, and that could make signing Gibbs-White tricky.
Manchester City are also said to be interested, and Tottenham apparently tried to sign the 26-year-old with a £60 million offer, but that move fell apart.
Man United's Scott McTominay stance
As for Scott McTominay, it sounds like United aren’t planning a reunion. Despite recent talk about bringing the Napoli midfielder back, TEAMtalk reports United aren’t interested, and the idea hasn’t even come up in the recruitment department.
Napoli now values McTominay at close to £70 million, just a year and a half after he left United for around £25 million. He made the move to Italy in the summer of 2024 and, in his first season, helped Napoli win the Serie A title.