OFFICIAL VAR REVIEW SUMMED: EXPLAINING CONTROVERSIAL MAN CITY VS NEWCASTLE DECISION CALL
Man City's 2-1 defeat to Newcastle was marred by VAR controversy on the winning goal. The Premier League later clarified the onside and no-foul decisions, as City slipped down the table.
Game Score & League Situation: Manchester City was beaten by Newcastle United with a score of 2-1 on Saturday night. Because of this defeat, Pep Guardiola's squad could not get closer to Arsenal, who are currently at the top of the Premier League.
Disputed Goal that Won the Game: Harvey Barnes' goal, which gave his team the win, was quickly looked at again by VAR because people thought someone might have been offside or committed a foul on the goalie. After VAR said that Bruno Guimaraes was not offside when the play started, the goal was allowed.
Explanation from the Premier League: The Premier League Match Centre then put out a statement to explain why they made that choice. The explanation said that they checked and made sure that both Guimaraes and Barnes were not offside, and they decided that City's goalie, Gianluigi Donnarumma, was not fouled.
Complaints from the First Half: City was also upset with the referees because of something that happened earlier with Phil Foden. In the first half, they wanted a penalty because it looked like Fabian Schar had challenged Foden inside the penalty area, but they did not get it.
What Guardiola Did: Manager Pep Guardiola did not talk to the media for very long after the game, speaking for less than five minutes. Even though it was clear how he felt about the questionable calls, he made a point not to say anything bad about the referees.
Alan Shearer's Opinion: Alan Shearer, who used to play striker for Newcastle, told Man City to think about how they played defence instead of complaining about the referee's calls. He stated that the biggest "concern" for the Blues should be how many chances they gave Newcastle to score.
How It Affects the League Table: This loss is the fourth time that Manchester City has been beaten in the current Premier League season. Because of this bad outcome, the champions from last year have dropped in the standings, going below Chelsea.
DERBY OUTRAGE: PETER BANKES DOUBLES DOWN ON DISALLOWED KOLO MUANI GOAL DESPITE MASSIVE CRITICISM
Referee verdict: Discover why Peter Bankes disallowed Kolo Muani’s goal and Keith Hackett’s "stupid and soft" reaction.
Referee Peter Bankes stood by his call to disallow Randal Kolo Muani’s equaliser in the North London derby, calling it “a very, very clear offence.”
The moment sparked outrage. Gabriel, Arsenal’s defender, hit the deck after Muani’s challenge in the box. Former Premier League referees’ chief Keith Hackett didn’t hold back, calling the decision “stupid and soft".
Bankes didn’t hesitate. He blew for a foul, ruled out the goal, and VAR stayed out of it, even as Spurs fans fumed. That goal would’ve levelled it at 2-2.
Bankes explained on the Match Officials Mic’d Up show: “I was exactly where I needed to be for a cross from the right. I saw the Tottenham player put two hands into the back of the Arsenal player. That’s what grabbed my attention. When you see that live, it looks like a straightforward push – a clear foul.
“I held off on the whistle to let play run, then made the call after the ball went in. That way, VAR could step in if I’d missed something or if it looked off. But honestly, on the pitch, it looked obvious.
“I’m still comfortable with my decision. Sure, things can look different at different speeds; slow motion isn’t the same as seeing it live. But I got one look, and I was confident the two hands on the back had enough impact to be a foul.
“I know people will split on this, but I’m comfortable. That’s a free kick for me.”
The decision was a huge break for Arsenal, who ended up winning 4-1. As far as Spurs fans were concerned, Gabriel got away with one.
Ex-Premier League referee Dermot Gallagher backed Bankes up: “The on-field decision always stands. The ref saw enough for a push. VAR isn’t going to overturn that when the evidence is there.”
THE GIBBS-WHITE PROJECT: WHY MANCHESTER UNITED SEE THE FOREST STAR AS THEIR NEXT PLAYMAKER
United transfer hub. Get the report on wage bill cuts, the Forest playmaker, and City’s rival interest.
Manchester United still have a bit of a wait before the summer transfer window opens, but talk around Old Trafford is already heating up. People keep linking United with all kinds of new signings for when the season wraps up.
Michael Carrick has made quite the impression as United’s interim head coach so far. The club handed him the reins until the end of the season, and honestly, he’s done well with the opportunity.
Still, no one really knows who’ll be in charge next season. That uncertainty just adds fuel to the rumours about which players United will chase in the transfer market.
Right now, everything hinges on Champions League qualification. United sit fourth in the Premier League after a 1-0 win over Everton on Monday night. That spot could make all the difference for summer plans.
Morgan Gibbs-White's claim
Now, United have reportedly joined the hunt for Nottingham Forest’s Morgan Gibbs-White. The Daily Mail says United are keeping an eye on the Forest playmaker, maybe even lining up a summer move.
But there’s a snag: United want to bring down their wage bill, and that could make signing Gibbs-White tricky.
Manchester City are also said to be interested, and Tottenham apparently tried to sign the 26-year-old with a £60 million offer, but that move fell apart.
Man United's Scott McTominay stance
As for Scott McTominay, it sounds like United aren’t planning a reunion. Despite recent talk about bringing the Napoli midfielder back, TEAMtalk reports United aren’t interested, and the idea hasn’t even come up in the recruitment department.
Napoli now values McTominay at close to £70 million, just a year and a half after he left United for around £25 million. He made the move to Italy in the summer of 2024 and, in his first season, helped Napoli win the Serie A title.