NEW ERA STARTS: PREMIER LEAGUE FINANCIAL RULES ADOPTED FOR 2026/27

Premier League clubs vote to scrap PSR, introducing new Squad Cost Ratio (SCR) rules for 2026/27. The 85% spending cap replaces old loss limits, while a controversial salary anchor was rejected.

NEW ERA STARTS: Premier League Financial Rules Adopted For 2026/27
Exceed 85%? Fines & Points Deductions Confirmed By PL

Premier League teams agreed to the biggest change to money rules in a while, and these new rules will begin in 2026–2027.

The league says that teams have chosen to change from the current Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) to the Squad Cost Ratio (SCR) and Sustainability and Systematic Resilience (SSR) for next season.

Only seven teams were in favour of the top-to-bottom anchoring (TBA) salary limit, which would have limited how much teams could spend on salaries and transfer costs (including agent fees) to five times the money and TV income given to the team that came in last place. Players saw it as a limit on what they could earn, and both of Manchester's best teams were very much against the most debated of the topics being voted on.

The SCR, which was agreed to by the required 14 teams, will limit teams' "on-field spending" to "85 per cent of their football income and net profit/loss on player sales" starting next season. This new rule will take the place of PSR, which limits club losses to £105 million ($137 million) over three years.

Teams will also have a "multi-year allowance of 30%" under SCR, which they can use to spend more than the 85%. Teams must stick to their allowed 85%, or they could face a sports-related penalty. There will be a cost for using this allowance.

The League will now follow UEFA's current SCR rules, which are now set at a limit of 70%. In 2024, UEFA penalised Chelsea and Aston Villa for not following the SCR rules.

The Premier League said that the new rules "are meant to help all teams have a chance to achieve greater success," as well as "clear tracking and penalties during the season, protection from poor performance, the chance to spend before earning money, a stronger ability to invest off the field, and less complication by focusing on football costs."

The league's statement says that SSR, the other change that was approved, is meant to "assess a club's financial health in the short, medium, and long term." Three tests—the Working Capital Test, the Liquidity Test, and the Positive Equity Test—will check if teams can handle short-term costs while also considering their balance sheet and long-term financial health.

LIVERPOOL TARGET EMILIANO MARTINEZ AS JUVENTUS CLOSE IN ON LEGEND ALISSON BECKER

Discover why FSG are targeting Emi Martinez to replace Alisson, as Villa face pressure to sell their highest-earning players.

top-news
Aston Villa Eye James Trafford As Potential Replacement For Liverpool-Bound Emiliano Martinez - Photo Credit: Getty Images

There’s growing talk about Liverpool potentially moving for Aston Villa’s Emiliano Martinez as they weigh up options if Alisson Becker leaves for Juventus this summer, according to TEAMtalk.

Alisson has been a rock for Liverpool since they paid a hefty fee to sign him from Roma in 2018. Over eight seasons, he’s helped secure six major trophies, including two Premier League titles and the Champions League, earning a reputation as one of the club’s best-ever goalkeepers.

But with his contract expiring in just over a year, it seems likely he might leave for a new challenge abroad. Sources suggest Juventus are confident about signing him this summer and has also been targeting other Premier League players.

This potential departure has pushed Liverpool’s owners, FSG, to explore the goalkeeper market carefully and consider strong replacements for such a key position.

Sources confirm that Martinez is once again drawing significant transfer interest ahead of the window. Aston Villa, meanwhile, are under pressure to balance their books and have Martinez, one of their highest earners with a contract until 2029, firmly on their minds.

Villa has begun looking into possible replacements too, making enquiries about several goalkeepers, including Manchester City’s James Trafford.

Martinez’s situation is catching attention across Europe, and Liverpool is among the clubs aware he could be available.

Within Liverpool’s recruitment team, Martinez is highly regarded and seen as a serious candidate should Alisson depart. Juventus has offered Alisson an attractive long-term contract, something Liverpool could match, but apparently are hesitant to do so at this point.

Discussions between Alisson and Juventus have reportedly progressed well, with the player keen to test himself in Serie A. This uncertainty has made Liverpool carefully consider their next steps in goal.

While youngster Giorgi Mamardashvili is promising, there’s still some doubt about whether he’s ready to immediately take on the number one role at a club chasing top honours every season.

That has led Liverpool to broaden its search and look at more experienced options. Martinez stands out for his leadership, mentality, and top-level experience, qualities Liverpool values highly, given his recent performances for both Villa and Argentina.

His reputation as a commanding figure and elite shot-stopper also makes him attractive to those handling Liverpool’s recruitment.

Aston Villa aren’t pushing Martinez out aggressively, but they acknowledge a significant offer could force serious talks this summer. With financial realities to face, tough decisions might be on the horizon for the Midlands club.

Liverpool’s manager, Arne Slot, has hinted at a possible “changing of the guard” regarding Alisson this summer, noting that all transfers are carefully considered with the club’s best interests in mind.

He mentioned experience is a factor in keeping players like Alisson, but ultimately it will be the club’s decision, especially with just one year left on the current deal.

While StadiumNest sources say the Juventus move is gaining serious momentum, some journalists believe selling Alisson could turn out to be a major mistake for Liverpool.

At the same time, there’s a growing unease within Liverpool about whether letting Caoimhin Kelleher go last summer was a misstep, which now adds to their uncertainty over goalkeeping options going forward.

ALAN SHEARER SLAMS VAR INCONSISTENCY AFTER ARSENAL SCRAPE PAST WEST HAM IN LONDON

Discover why Alan Shearer and Gary Lineker are questioning VAR consistency following Callum Wilson’s disallowed goal in London.

top-news
Alan Shearer Is Blasting Premier League Refereeing Decisions - Courtesy Picture

Alan Shearer didn’t hold back after Arsenal’s tense 1-0 win over West Ham, blasting what he sees as the Premier League’s inconsistent officiating.

West Ham, desperate for points at the bottom of the table, thought they’d snatched a late equaliser when Callum Wilson scored in stoppage time. But VAR caught a foul; Pablo was judged to have collided with Arsenal’s keeper David Raya, and the goal got chalked off. The review dragged on, too, with VAR official Darren England studying the replays for more than four minutes before telling referee Chris Kavanagh to check the monitor himself.

Shearer, chatting with Gary Lineker and Micah Richards on The Rest is Football podcast, admitted the officials probably got it right in the end. Still, he said, VAR hasn’t fixed the bigger problem: referees can’t seem to make consistent calls.

“Some people think that’s a foul; some don’t,” Shearer said. “But where’s the consistency? Every week we’re seeing almost identical incidents.”

He pointed to another recent VAR call last week at Everton; Bernardo Silva drew a holding foul, but Merlin Rohl barely got a second look from the officials. “Where was VAR then?” Shearer asked.

The frustration goes beyond just the players and coaches. “Fans will show you screenshots of similar moments, and sometimes it’s a foul; sometimes it’s nothing. That’s why people are upset.”

West Ham walk away empty-handed, missing out on what could’ve been a crucial point in their relegation battle. Arsenal, meanwhile, hang on at the top, still five clear of Manchester City.

Gary Lineker added his two cents: “Probably a foul, but this isn’t how it’s supposed to work. If I were a West Ham or Man City fan, I’d be angry too. There were all kinds of grappling at that corner, Arsenal players grabbing West Ham attackers everywhere. Sure, keepers get special protection, and maybe it was a foul. But what about everything else going on in the box?”

Wayne Rooney, though, gave the officials some rare credit on his own show. “Clear foul in my book. You can see the arm hit Raya’s face, and he can’t reach the ball. VAR actually did its job in a big moment.”

Read More News