SIR JIM RATCLIFFE SNUBBED WHILE UNITED PLANS MONUMENTAL STADIUM UPGRADE

Mayor Andy Burnham reaffirms no public money will fund Man Utd's new £2bn New Trafford stadium. A development corporation will oversee wider area regeneration, aiming for the 2035 Women's World Cup final.

Sir Jim Ratcliffe Snubbed While United Plans Monumental Stadium Upgrade
Jim Ratcliffe Denied Funding Request - Photo Credit: PA Wire

The pledge that "not a penny of public money" will be used to construct Manchester United's new stadium, New Trafford, has been reaffirmed by Andy Burnham.

At a lavish London presentation in March, United unveiled its ambitious plan for a state-of-the-art stadium with 100,000 seats to replace Old Trafford. The club's controversial co-owner, Sir Jim Ratcliff, hinted that the massive project would be completed by 2030. The billionaire tax exile even proposed that taxpayers contribute to the £2 billion plan's funding.

Ratcliffe argued: "People in the north pay their tax, and there is an argument you could think about a more ambitious project in the north which would be fitting for England, for the Champions League final or the FA Cup final." Ratcliffe has been responsible for several of the ruthless cuts at United since the chairman of INEOS chemicals took over in February 2024.

On The Added Time Podcast, the mayor of Greater Manchester has remained steadfast in his position that no public funds would be allocated for the stadium itself.

However, according to the Manchester Evening News, a Mayoral Development Corporation has recently been established for the larger ground-level revitalisation project, which is expected to yield significant financial benefits.

"We have a fairly clear premise here at the beginning of this journey with the Mayoral Development Corporation, so it is not about handing them money," Burnham stated. The stadium will be funded by Manchester United. None of the public funds will be used for that.

But given the financial advantages that come with it, we undoubtedly have a part to play in making the stadium as good as it can be. If you consider it, the train station behind the stand has been abandoned for safety reasons for a number of years.

The public would greatly benefit from this since part of it would see that station moved somewhat, perhaps closer to Lou Macari's Chippy or somewhere nearby. Once it reopens, it would greatly benefit the local villages of Gorst Hill, Stretford, and the residents.

"It is considerably wider than the ground itself, with thousands of new dwellings and thousands of new employment."

According to the Manchester Evening News, United and the city area are collaborating in an effort to secure key FIFA Women's World Cup events for the arena in 2035, including the championship match.

"I am so involved that we have just asked parliament to form a Mayoral Development Corporation," Burnham said, endorsing the goal of holding the 2035 World Cup final in Manchester. Thus, it is a vehicle, a legal entity, that will be in charge of the area's overall regeneration.

"I am more accountable for the surroundings of any new stadium. As a city and a region, we have a tremendous opportunity. The neighbourhood surrounding the former Salford docks comes to mind when you think about that location.

On the opposite side of you is Media City. If we get it right, this place might become a global destination. There are freight terminals behind the current Old Trafford that send many trains into Manchester city centre, but I know that people here find it difficult to understand how that affects living on this end of the M62 [Liverpool].

"It produces congestion in Manchester, which is a big factor in the havoc on the northern railways. As a result, every train travelling across the nation frequently arrives in Liverpool late.

"There are a lot of reasons why this initiative makes sense. In fact, it would cause growth here [Liverpool] by moving the freight tunnels to St Helens.

It is a significant development initiative for the entire Northwest. And if we really get things going, I believe there is a good chance we will be hosting the FIFA World Cup for women in 2035. That is an exciting idea.

"Consider a final at the recently constructed Old Trafford. Indeed, it would be a remarkable event.

While negotiations to secure important land pieces continue, the new stadium's layout has been placed on hold. The railway depot surrounding Old Trafford is owned by Freightliner, and this area is essential to achieving the ambitious goals.

United is still optimistic that it can find a deal to acquire the land required for its groundbreaking stadium project.

GARETH BARRY URGES MANCHESTER UNITED TO SIGN ELLIOT ANDERSON FOR £100M

Gareth Barry identifies Elliot Anderson as the ideal Casemiro replacement as the Brazilian prepares to leave Man Utd.

top-news
United face £100m battle for Anderson as Nottingham Forest fight for survival - Courtesy Picture

Gareth Barry, the former Premier League midfielder, thinks Manchester United should target Elliot Anderson to take Casemiro’s place. Casemiro, now 34, already said he’s leaving Old Trafford when his contract ends this summer.

United’s decision not to extend Casemiro’s deal fits with their plan to shake up the squad. They paid Real Madrid an initial £60 million for him in 2022, and with add-ons, the deal reached £70 million. Casemiro’s on big wages around £300,000 a week, which gets closer to £350,000 if United make the Champions League. There’s also uncertainty about Manuel Ugarte’s future. With both potentially on the way out, plenty of names are being floated as replacements.

Carlos Baleba, Sandro Tonali, and Adam Wharton are all in the conversation, but Barry sees Anderson as the best option.

Talking to BOYLE Sports, Barry explained, “Manchester United will definitely be searching for someone to fill Casemiro’s shoes. Anderson isn’t the same kind of player, and there’s a big age difference, too. What he brings is pretty unique.

“I really rate Elliot Anderson. If you’re a United scout, you’re talking about him. Off the ball, there aren’t many better. He presses, he shuts down space, and he’s great at winning the ball back. Plus, he can play forward too.

“That’s why Thomas Tuchel starts him for England over some big names, and why he could easily start at the World Cup. I’m sure he’s getting discussed in various boardrooms, not just at Manchester United.

“If a move’s going to happen, it’s better to get it over the line quickly. It just makes everything smoother for both clubs and the player, especially with a big tournament coming up.”

Barry added, “No one wants uncertainty hanging over Anderson while he’s focused on England at the World Cup. It doesn’t help anyone. And if he has a standout tournament, his price could easily go up.

“So if everyone agrees it’s time for a move, getting the deal sorted before the World Cup just makes sense.”

Even so, Nottingham Forest won’t be keen to let Anderson go. Since joining Newcastle in 2024, he’s become a vital part of their midfield. Forest supposedly set its price at £100 million, but their relegation fight could change things. Right now, Vitor Pereira’s squad sits 16th in the table, just three points clear of the drop zone with seven games to play. names and

FA CHARGES HARRY MAGUIRE FOR "IMPROPER BEHAVIOR" FOLLOWING COSTLY BOURNEMOUTH DISMISSAL

Michael Carrick’s side faces a defensive crisis as Harry Maguire is charged by the FA for improper conduct.

top-news
Harry Maguire faces "abusive language" probe after Bournemouth red card - Photo Credit: Getty Images

Harry Maguire has been charged by the Football Association over his conduct following the red card he received in Manchester United’s 2-2 draw against Bournemouth. 

The defender was sent off after officials judged that he pulled back Evanilson inside the penalty area during their Premier League meeting last month. Maguire challenged the decision with both referee Stuart Atwell and fourth official Matt Donohue once VAR confirmed the call. 

That penalty allowed Junior Kroupi to score the equaliser, helping Bournemouth claw back a point against Michael Carrick’s side.

According to an FA statement, Maguire faces charges relating to improper behaviour and/or the use of abusive or insulting language towards the fourth official after his dismissal. He has until April 2 to respond to these allegations.

As things stand, Maguire is due to serve a one-match ban for the red card, which would rule him out of Manchester United's game against Leeds at Old Trafford on April 13. If his ban is extended following this charge, he could also miss the clash with Chelsea on April 18, an encounter that could be crucial, given United sit third and hold a seven-point cushion over sixth-placed Chelsea in the battle for Champions League spots.

Earlier, Daily Mail Sport reported that Manchester United lodged a formal complaint with the PGMOL after the Bournemouth draw. The club were particularly frustrated over a denied second penalty, where Amad Diallo appeared to be brought down in the box while they led 1-0. Bournemouth then equalised through Ryan Christie in the ensuing play, and a VAR review did not overturn the decision, which may have swung momentum considerably.

Inside the United camp, there’s a sense that Maguire’s foul, which led to Bournemouth's second equaliser, mirrored the unpunished challenge on Diallo involving Adrien Truffert. That comparison fuels their belief that some decisions during the game didn’t go their way.

Read More News