StadiumPosts Logo
Stay upto date with notifications from Stadiumposts
Notifications can be managed in browser preferences

JUSTICE SERVED’ — MICHAEL JORDAN WINS BIG AGAINST NASCAR

A judge ruled in favour of Michael Jordan's 23XI Racing in its antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR, denying the racing body a summary judgment and allowing the case to proceed to trial on December 1.

Justice Served’ — Michael Jordan Wins Big Against NASCAR
Jordan Outplays NASCAR Legally - COURTESY/PHOTO

As his antitrust case against NASCAR moves closer to a trial, Michael Jordan won another judicial battle against the racing organisation on Tuesday. 

Judge Kenneth Bell rejected NASCAR's claim that its teams could compete in other series while acknowledging its dominance over its own sport on Tuesday, ruling in favour of Jordan's 23XI Racing, which he co-owns with Denny Hamlin, and Front Row Motorsports regarding the market definition of "premier stock-car racing." NASCAR's petition for a summary judgment in the case was also turned down by Bell. 

Dr Daniel Rascher, a professor of sports economics at the University of San Francisco, testified in support of the plaintiffs' claim that "NASCAR's Cup Series is currently the only buyer." According to Rascher, "elite stock car racing" is not a suitable substitute for NASCAR because it is distinct from other forms of auto racing like Formula 1 and IndyCar.

Jordan's lawyer, Jeffrey Epstein, released a statement on Tuesday saying, "We are very delighted with the Court's judgment today, deciding in our favour." Finding that NASCAR possesses monopoly power in a properly defined market, it not only rejects NASCAR's motion for summary judgment but also grants our partial petition for summary judgment. 

As a result, the trial can now concentrate on determining whether NASCAR has abused its authority to hurt teams and maintained it through anticompetitive behaviour. We are focused on getting a decision that benefits all of the teams, partners, drivers, and fans, and we are ready to make our case to the jury.

NASCAR's counterclaim that its racing teams illegally colluded against it during talks on new charter agreements was also refuted by Bell. 

The sale and purchase of elite stock car racing services cannot be considered a separate relevant market based solely on the side that is complaining, Bell noted in his ruling. "To put it simply, NASCAR took a calculated move by launching its counterclaim and now has to deal with the fallout."

In October 2024, Jordan's team and Front Row Racing filed a lawsuit against NASCAR, accusing the family-run racing organisation from France of being "monopolistic bullies." The plaintiffs claim that because NASCAR's charter system binds teams to its suppliers, racetracks, and series, it reduces competition. (Several of the racetracks where the series races, including Talladega Superspeedway and Daytona International Speedway, are owned by the France family.)

Bell and other owners are among the parties who have urged the two sides to settle. However, Jordan has stated in the past that he is okay with the matter going to trial on December 1. The entire charter structure might be overturned if NASCAR loses in court. Since 23XI Racing and Front Row will be competing without a charter the following season, which entails much lower prize money, they will probably go out of business if they lose. 

NASCAR is "doing our hardest" to resolve the complaint, according to NASCAR commissioner Steve Phelps, who made that statement a week ago.  

According to a statement released by the racing organisation on Tuesday, "NASCAR has done nothing anticompetitive in establishing the sport from the ground up since 1948." "Although we accept the Court's ruling, we think it has legal flaws, and if needed, we will address it at trial and in the Fourth Circuit. In spite of 23XI and Front Row's attempts to argue that the charter system is anticompetitive in and of itself, NASCAR will continue to support the system.

JUST IN: WHY JOE CULLEN CLAIMS MENSUR SULJOVIC'S "SLOW PLAY" IS ACTUALLY ILLEGAL GAMESMANSHIP.

Inside the Ally Pally meltdown as Joe Cullen blasts "The Gentle Giant" for slow play and "fake" celebrations.

top-news
Referee Kirk Bevins intervenes as Mensur Suljovic’s celebrations spark Ally Pally fury.

Mensur Suljovic got a talking to from referee Kirk Bevins for celebrating too much when he beat Joe Cullen at the World Darts Championship. The veteran got into the third round after a tough win against his British rival, who blew an early lead. It was unexpected since Cullen was expected to win.

The match was tense because Cullen got more and more annoyed with Suljovic's slow pace. After hitting the dart that won him the game, the 53-year-old jumped around the stage, enjoying the crowd at Alexandra Palace. He went to say hello to Cullen, but Cullen wasn't interested, brushing him off and glaring at him.

Suljovic kept enjoying his win, soaking up the applause. He also celebrated winning legs during the match, and at one point, Bevins told him off for taking too long.

After the match, he told Sky Sports about Cullen's anger and said he wasn't slowing down to throw Cullen off.

Suljovic said, "I don’t know; what’s his problem?" I give him missed doubles, everything. I like Joe Cullen, a very nice guy. I never play slow. I do it only for my game. I’m never doing this for him. Sorry Joe, never do this. I love him, man.

Cullen was obviously mad and went on social media right after the match to say Suljovic 'cheated' to win.

If that’s darts, I don’t want any part of it, Cullen wrote. Always liked Mensur away from the board, but that was plain for all to see!

I don’t think I’m alone in feeling this way. The old guard will say it’s part of the game, but word it how you will—it’s CHEATING! That’s not darts.

At the press conference after the match, Suljovic was asked about Cullen's anger and if he had said sorry for playing slowly.

Confused, he said, "Never have I ever said sorry to Joe Cullen in person." I play on that stage; what's his problem?

I say sorry, maybe, to the referee, maybe, but for Joe Cullen? Never. 'You play this, you play this.' Everybody plays differently. I wait maybe 40 seconds before the first dart.

Some guys (gestures throwing motion) and my head (gestures almost being hit in the head by a dart). This is not okay. I don't know what his problem is. What is the problem? I gave him missed doubles and everything.

I'm never doing darts not correctly. Maybe I am (gestures a celebration), my face or 'come on' too much. I like Joe Cullen. He is a very nice guy, but...

Suljovic will play either Luke Littler or David Davies in the third round of the World Darts Championship next week, hoping to keep going at Alexandra Palace.

SHOCK REVEALED: WHY LEBRON JAMES AND JJ REDICK ARE TAKING ON NBA OFFICIATING.

LeBron James drops 36 points in Lakers' loss but erupts over officiating. Redick joins the revolt against NBA "unfairness."

top-news
LeBron James erupts over "zero consistency" as Lakers' injury crisis deepens.

LeBron James and JJ Redick of the Los Angeles Lakers.

After the Lakers lost to the Clippers on Saturday, LeBron James and coach JJ Redick weren't happy with the officiating. It was the second game in a row where Lakers players got technical fouls for complaining too much.

James told reporters after the game that he was confused by how referees have been all over the place this season.

“I don't get the consistency. There isn't any. It just is what it is,” James said, according to Dan Woike of The Athletic.

James, who's almost 41, ended the Lakers' 103-88 loss with 36 points, four rebounds, three assists, and two steals. He had to do a lot of work because Luka Doncic got hurt and couldn't play in the second half.

Besides that, the Lakers were already missing Austin Reaves, Rui Hachimura, and DeAndre Ayton.

Redick Thinks the Same as James About the Need for Consistency

Lakers coach JJ Redick agreed with LeBron James that the NBA officiating hasn't been consistent this season. So, Redick plans to talk to Byron Spruell, the NBA’s President of League Operations.

“The consistency is a problem, and I’m going to talk to Byron about it. It needs to be fixed. If any coach or player could have anything, it would be consistency. I'm not calling out any refs or crews. It's just that we need to know what to expect each night,” Redick said, via Fadeaway World.

In the last few days, there have been several situations that suggest the NBA has a problem. Coaches David Adelman of the Denver Nuggets and Chris Finch of the Minnesota Timberwolves were kicked out after they yelled at referees.

Even Steve Kerr of the Golden State Warriors was surprised when Draymond Green was ejected for complaining against the Phoenix Suns on Saturday.

NBC Sports Bay Area reported that Kerr said referees ejected Green for talking, but Dillon Brooks wasn't ejected for punching Steph Curry in the stomach last Thursday.

James' Message Since Injuries

With four of the Lakers' five starters injured, LeBron James had a simple message for his teammates. James will have to lead the team during another injury crisis to try and keep them competitive in the tough Western Conference.

“No matter what, it’s next man up. We’re all pros and have to stay ready. It's very tough for our team right now, but we played hard and did what we were supposed to. We just didn’t get the win,” James said, via Lakers Nation.

The good thing for the Lakers is that Austin Reaves and DeAndre Ayton might be back soon. But they have a tough schedule to finish the year. They play the Phoenix Suns, Houston Rockets, Sacramento Kings, and Detroit Pistons in their last four games of 2025.

Premier League Standings

WhatsApp Read More News