PREMIER LEAGUE SPARKS OUTRAGE WITH RADICAL SALARY CAP PROPOSAL
The Premier League is voting on a historic £550m spending cap. This "anchoring" system aims to create balance but faces legal threats from the PFA and fierce opposition from top clubs like Man City & United, who fear it will hurt European competitiveness.
One of the biggest and most contentious economic reforms in Premier League history is about to be implemented: a stringent spending cap that would drastically curtail the financial clout of the most affluent clubs.
The plan, dubbed "anchoring," will be put to a vote in November and will pit a group of mid-table clubs committed to establishing competitive balance against the league's aspirational elite.
The world's richest football league's economic environment would change if the measure is passed.
Aiming to bridge the growing financial divide created by the present PSR (Profitability and Sustainability Rules), the change is already encountering strong opposition, including the possibility of legal action from the players' union.
What the £550 million ceiling looks like
The proposed "anchoring" plan would limit clubs' expenditure to no more than five times the broadcast and prize money made by the Premier League's bottom-place team.
This expenditure cap would be set at around £550 million (€630 million) for the entire squad's expenses (wages, transfers, and agents' fees), according to recent estimates.
Even while this amount is considerable right now, it serves as a concrete means of regulating expenditure growth by preventing the wealthiest clubs in the league from withdrawing financially in the future.
A two-thirds majority (14 out of 20 clubs) is needed to approve the proposal.
The PFA and the Titans' opposition
The teams that stand to lose the most financial independence have immediately and vehemently opposed the concept.
The opposition is led by elite teams like Manchester United and City, who claim that the cap will weaken the Premier League's hegemony in Europe.
They argue that cutting spending would endanger the departure of international players like Mohamed Salah and Erling Haaland and make it impossible to compete with European rivals like Real Madrid and Paris Saint-Germain, who do not have such a cap.
In addition, the Professional Footballers' Association (PFA) has threatened legal action and expressed strong objection.
By claiming that such measures are an unlawful restraint on pay and free-market competition, the players' union successfully contested the EFL's effort to establish a salary cap in the lower leagues.
The Premier League is now at a pivotal juncture, and the fight is scheduled for November.
CONOR GALLAGHER CONFIRMED AS "VITAL" STARTER FOR SPURS FOLLOWING BENTANCUR’S INJURY LAYOFF
Conor Gallagher proved the doubters wrong against Man City. Discover why his €40m move to Tottenham is finally paying off for Spurs.
Chelsea and Atletico Madrid both decided Conor Gallagher wasn’t worth the trouble. At Chelsea, he had his moments—Pochettino liked him, but the fans never really warmed up. When Chelsea shipped him off to Atletico, it made sense. Enzo Fernandez stepped up, took over Gallagher’s role, and fit in perfectly next to Caicedo, with Cole Palmer adding that extra spark up front.
Things didn’t get much better for Gallagher in Spain. He barely got a chance at Atleti, lost his spot in the starting eleven, and pretty much ended up on the transfer list before anyone had time to blink. Interest was lukewarm at best until the winter window rolled around. Aston Villa wanted him and went after him pretty aggressively, but then Tottenham swooped in late. Spurs needed someone to patch up the midfield after Bentancur’s injury, so they just paid up—40 million euros, no hesitation.
His start at Tottenham? Rough. Honestly, that was to be expected. He’d played well at Palace before, but after his struggles at Atleti, he needed time to adjust. Sitting on the bench in Spain didn’t do him any favours.
Then Gallagher showed up. People doubted whether he could really add creativity and move the ball forward for Spurs, so his early struggles got people worried. But then came the 2-2 draw against Manchester City. He suddenly looked like the player both Ange Postecoglou and Thomas Frank were so desperate to sign.
Against City, Gallagher flipped the script. He set up a crucial assist, drove play forward on the dribble, and kept drawing fouls—everything the Spurs needed. Defensively, he was all over the place in a good way: two tackles, three interceptions, a full 90 minutes, and a huge part of the Spurs clawing their way back into the game.
Tottenham fans loved it. They saw the effort, the attitude, and the hunger to win. Gallagher just wouldn’t quit, and in that second half, he, Xavi Simons, Pape Matar Sarr, Destiny Udogie, and Dominic Solanke ran the show. Four of those guys have been carrying Spurs lately, so Gallagher is fitting right in with them. That’s a pretty good sign he’s going to work out just fine in North London.
AC MILAN MEDICAL FAILURE: THE HIDDEN KNEE INJURY THAT CRUSHED MATETA’S £30M MOVE
Jean-Philippe Mateta's £30m move to AC Milan is OFF. Discover why a failed medical has put his France World Cup dreams in jeopardy.