PREMIER LEAGUE RULES DECIDE IF JACK GREALISH CAN PLAY MAN CITY
Jack Grealish is thriving on loan at Everton but is ineligible to face his parent club, Man City, due to Premier League loan rules. The winger has 1 goal & 4 assists this season.
As of right now, Jack Grealish's transfer to Everton has been a huge success, and the England international is finally playing in the first team again.
Under Pep Guardiola, the 30-year-old's career at Man City had started to stall, and he had never really established himself as a regular starter.
Grealish appears to be back to his best after securing a change of scenery. He opened the 2025–26 Premier League season at the brand-new Hill Dickinson Stadium with a goal and four assists.
But because of the English football regulations that prohibit the loanee from playing this weekend, the Toffees will need to find alternative solutions as they get ready to play Grealish's "parent club" at the Etihad Stadium on October 18.
Is Jack Grealish able to play for Everton against Manchester City?
Jack Grealish will not be eligible to play in either of Everton's domestic games against Man City, including the away game on October 18 and the home game on May 2, 2026, because of the limitations imposed on his loan.
According to Premier League regulations, players who are loaned to domestic teams are not permitted to play against their parent club in league or cup competitions.
However, this regulation is unique to English football and is not commonly used. Grealish would therefore have been available to play if these two clubs had ever met in a European competition.
Why are loan players unable to play for their parent team?
For a long time, the Premier League has prohibited players who are on loan from playing for their parent club.
This is to avoid the awkward scenario when players who are contracted to a specific club negatively impact their competitive endeavours while on loan.
However, in other parts of Europe and the world, this is not typically the case. In contrast to England, most leagues let each loan's talks and contract determine this restriction. Therefore, for such a restriction to be effective, it needs to be included in each specific loan agreement.
This type of restriction is frowned upon in many nations, including Spain. It is common to refer to a provision in a player's loan agreement that prohibits them from playing against their parent club as a "fear clause." The prevailing belief is that if a player is sent abroad because they are surplus to needs, the parent club should not be concerned about them getting wounded on the pitch; otherwise, they should not have sent them out in the first place.
Jack Grealish's Everton loan agreement
For the 2025–2026 season, Jack Grealish moved on loan to Everton as his career at Manchester City stagnated.
To boost his profile and position himself to play for England in the 2026 FIFA World Cup, the 30-year-old joined the Toffees with the hopes of playing more minutes.
Numerous reports state that Everton will cover seventy-five per cent of Grealish's annual salary under the terms of the transaction, which came at a cost of roughly £12 million (€13.8 million or $16.1 million).
According to the sources, Everton has a £50 million (€57.5 million or $66.9 million) buy option at the end of the current campaign. However, considering the player's age and Everton's present financial situation, it is extremely improbable that this amount will be activated.
CONOR GALLAGHER CONFIRMED AS "VITAL" STARTER FOR SPURS FOLLOWING BENTANCUR’S INJURY LAYOFF
Conor Gallagher proved the doubters wrong against Man City. Discover why his €40m move to Tottenham is finally paying off for Spurs.
Chelsea and Atletico Madrid both decided Conor Gallagher wasn’t worth the trouble. At Chelsea, he had his moments—Pochettino liked him, but the fans never really warmed up. When Chelsea shipped him off to Atletico, it made sense. Enzo Fernandez stepped up, took over Gallagher’s role, and fit in perfectly next to Caicedo, with Cole Palmer adding that extra spark up front.
Things didn’t get much better for Gallagher in Spain. He barely got a chance at Atleti, lost his spot in the starting eleven, and pretty much ended up on the transfer list before anyone had time to blink. Interest was lukewarm at best until the winter window rolled around. Aston Villa wanted him and went after him pretty aggressively, but then Tottenham swooped in late. Spurs needed someone to patch up the midfield after Bentancur’s injury, so they just paid up—40 million euros, no hesitation.
His start at Tottenham? Rough. Honestly, that was to be expected. He’d played well at Palace before, but after his struggles at Atleti, he needed time to adjust. Sitting on the bench in Spain didn’t do him any favours.
Then Gallagher showed up. People doubted whether he could really add creativity and move the ball forward for Spurs, so his early struggles got people worried. But then came the 2-2 draw against Manchester City. He suddenly looked like the player both Ange Postecoglou and Thomas Frank were so desperate to sign.
Against City, Gallagher flipped the script. He set up a crucial assist, drove play forward on the dribble, and kept drawing fouls—everything the Spurs needed. Defensively, he was all over the place in a good way: two tackles, three interceptions, a full 90 minutes, and a huge part of the Spurs clawing their way back into the game.
Tottenham fans loved it. They saw the effort, the attitude, and the hunger to win. Gallagher just wouldn’t quit, and in that second half, he, Xavi Simons, Pape Matar Sarr, Destiny Udogie, and Dominic Solanke ran the show. Four of those guys have been carrying Spurs lately, so Gallagher is fitting right in with them. That’s a pretty good sign he’s going to work out just fine in North London.
AC MILAN MEDICAL FAILURE: THE HIDDEN KNEE INJURY THAT CRUSHED MATETA’S £30M MOVE
Jean-Philippe Mateta's £30m move to AC Milan is OFF. Discover why a failed medical has put his France World Cup dreams in jeopardy.