SAUDI OWNERS ADDRESS NEWCASTLE SALE RUMOURS TO BUY UTD
Saudi Arabia's PIF has reportedly not ruled out selling Newcastle United to fund a takeover of Manchester United, despite Premier League rules prohibiting multi-club ownership.
The Public Investment Fund (PIF) of Saudi Arabia has stated unequivocally that it may sell Newcastle to finance the acquisition of Manchester United.
In October 2021, PIF, under the leadership of its governor Yasir Al-Rumayyan, acquired an 80 per cent majority share in Newcastle.
In contrast, the Glazer family put United up for sale in October 2022 after evaluating "all strategic choices for the future of the club".
Sheikh Jassim, a billionaire from Qatar, had indicated interest in buying the club altogether, but the Glazers ultimately agreed to sell Sir Jim Ratcliffe and INEOS 25% of their shares.
The arrangement, which was finalised in December 2023, has a number of important provisions, including a "drag-along" clause that might compel Ratcliffe to sell his shares after 18 months.
If the Glazers decided to sell the club to someone else, they would have to pay the British billionaire £26 per share, which he now controls in the region of 50 million shares.
Saudi boxing chairman Turki Alalshikh made the shocking assertion on Twitter on Wednesday night that United is "currently in an advanced stage of completing a contract to sell to a new investor."
Alalshikh's remarks are untrue, according to many United-affiliated individuals who spoke to BBC Sport, but they left supporters perplexed as to why the statement was made in the first place.
The Old Trafford teams are negotiating to play a midseason friendly in Saudi Arabia during the Riyadh Season, according to a report from The Athletic last week.
Although Alalshikh's responsibilities as Saudi Arabia's Global Entertainment Authority go beyond boxing, and he recently negotiated a deal with WWE for the Gulf Kingdom to host WrestleMania, the story made no mention of his involvement in those discussions.
There would be many obstacles to overcome if Saudi Arabia did show a genuine interest in acquiring United.
According to BBC Sport, Saudi Arabia's prospects of passing the Premier League's Owners and Directors' Test "seem doubtful", even if the people running Newcastle and United were distinct. This is because English football prohibits multi-club ownership by the same company.
In any case, it seems that the Saudis are not really eager to "dump" Newcastle.
Journalist Ben Jacobs stated in December 2022 that there was "no likelihood" of such occurring because PIF was totally focused on Newcastle.
In March 2023, Amanda Staveley, a former Newcastle chief executive who was a member of the PIF-led consortium that acquired the Magpies, told the Financial Times Football Summit (via Sky Sports): "We were very clear that we wanted a club with a passionate fanbase." Al-Rumayyan rarely discusses the Northeast club in public. We have that.
Because we [Staveley and husband Mehrdad Ghoudoussi] are also PIF partners, we also wanted a club that we could purchase at a reasonable price.
"We did not choose Liverpool, Chelsea, or the fantastic Tottenham. I am a huge Liverpool supporter, and we attempted to purchase them, but we decided to pay £350 million instead of X billion when we went to a Newcastle game.
"No, I do not think so [about PIF joining United or Liverpool]. "I truly do not see that occurring, but I cannot speak for PIF."
NEWCASTLE RE-IGNITE PURSUIT OF CHELSEA STRIKER LIAM DELAP FOR SUMMER WINDOW
Newcastle are targeting Chelsea striker Liam Delap as Eddie Howe looks to rebuild his attack after the Isak sale.
It seems Newcastle has its sights set on Liam Delap as a potential signing this summer, according to talkSPORT. Delap actually met Newcastle’s manager, Eddie Howe, before making his move from Ipswich to Chelsea last summer, and he came away with a positive impression of Howe.
Chelsea might be open to letting Delap go. This season, he’s only scored once in the Premier League, and injuries have disrupted his rhythm since he arrived at Stamford Bridge. Under Chelsea’s current boss, Liam Rosenior, Joao Pedro has been preferred up front since January, leaving Delap on the fringes.
On Newcastle’s side, there's a clear push to strengthen their attack despite already spending around £120 million last summer on Nick Woltemade and Yoane Wissa. Howe has made reinforcing the forward line a top priority for the upcoming window. The sale of Alexander Isak last summer left Howe short of attacking options, especially as the transfer window wound down. Isak had been important, scoring ten goals since he arrived, but just once since the start of 2026. Wissa has contributed a few goals this season as well, netting three in 21 appearances.
But neither Woltemade nor Wissa has made a significant impact yet; they’ve both been left on the bench during crucial matches, including both legs of Newcastle’s Champions League tie against Barcelona. In fact, neither got time on the pitch during the heavy 7-2 loss at the Nou Camp, and Woltemade, in particular, is reportedly frustrated about his limited role, especially in key games.
Howe has turned to using Anthony Gordon as a false nine and recently favoured Will Osula, who made a dramatic impact with a late goal against Manchester United. Despite arriving at Newcastle only in August, Woltemade’s future has already come under scrutiny, with Bayern Munich reportedly monitoring him, continuing their interest from last summer.
No matter who might leave this summer, Howe is actively searching for a striker to lead the attack next season. Delap fits the profile. He made an impression during his breakout season with Ipswich, scoring 12 goals in 37 league games. Newcastle was among several clubs interested in the Manchester City academy product before he signed for Chelsea, and their interest hasn’t faded since.
ALAN SHEARER REFUSES TO BACK DOWN IN ANTHONY GORDON BARCELONA SELECTION ROW
Alan Shearer doubles down on his stance that Anthony Gordon should have played through illness against Barcelona.
The debate around Anthony Gordon’s benching in Newcastle’s Champions League clash with Barcelona isn’t going away anytime soon. Alan Shearer, known for his strong opinions, has stuck to his guns even after Gordon publicly pushed back on the criticism.
Last week, Gordon was left out of the starting lineup for the first leg against Barcelona. Manager Eddie Howe later explained that Gordon was dealing with an illness leading up to the game and only came on in the 67th minute during the 1-1 draw at St James’ Park. Interestingly, Gordon has had a standout season, breaking Shearer’s Champions League goal record with 10 goals in 11 games, which makes the benching all the more contentious.
Shearer didn’t hold back after Gordon’s absence was confirmed, saying he believed the winger should have started. His rationale was straightforward: if a player is fit enough to train on the day of the game, they should be on the pitch, especially in such a crucial match against Barcelona with a spot in the quarter-finals at stake. He emphasised that it would take something truly exceptional to keep him out of that kind of game.
Gordon, however, fired back after scoring the winner at Stamford Bridge against Chelsea, hitting out at what he called the “nonsense” remarks. He revealed that even though he was bedridden and missed training for three days due to illness, he expected to start the match against Barcelona. The decision to rest him came from Howe, who informed him upon arrival at the stadium that he wouldn’t be in the starting XI, a decision Gordon admitted was difficult but ultimately up to the manager.
Shearer responded again during a recent episode of The Rest Is Football podcast, welcoming Gordon’s right to reply but standing firm on his original comments. He reiterated that, in his view, illness wouldn’t have sidelined him for such a vital game, even acknowledging the manager’s role in the decision but not changing his stance.
Adding further context, Howe clarified his part in the decision, emphasising that Gordon was very much willing to play against Barcelona. The final call was made jointly with the medical staff, who concluded that he wasn’t fit enough to start, despite the player’s readiness to go.
It’s a classic clash between player determination and managerial caution, and this back-and-forth highlights just how fine the lines can be in top-level football decisions. Regardless of where you stand, it’s clear both sides are passionate about what’s best for Newcastle’s success.